What MPTs must consider as per SPLUMA
Legislated criteria per development principle under Section 7, SPLUMA Act 16 of 2013 — in force from 1 July 2015
5
statutory principles a tribunal must weigh under Section 42
1
old "need and desirability" test replaced by all five
The five principles unpacked
① Spatial Justice
- Redress past spatial and other imbalances through access to land
- Address exclusion of the poor from land use processes
- Include poor and disadvantaged in planning decision-making
② Spatial Sustainability
- Development within fiscal, institutional and administrative means
- Protect prime and unique agricultural land
- Comply with applicable environmental legislation
- Limit and reverse urban sprawl
③ Spatial Efficiency
- Optimise use of existing resources and infrastructure
- Minimise negative financial, social, economic or environmental impacts
④ Spatial Resilience
- Accommodate flexibility in spatial plans for sustainable livelihoods
- Enable communities to withstand shocks and unexpected incidents
⑤ Good Administration
- Planned, integrated decision-making involving all relevant stakeholders
- Setting and meeting of timeframes for decisions
- Co-operative governance across all spheres of government
What changed: Before SPLUMA, tribunals applied a "need and desirability" test under the Development Facilitation Act — a narrower, more technical standard. Section 42 now requires all five principles to be considered in every land use application, and a tribunal may not be impeded in its discretion on the grounds that property values are affected (Section 57).
South Africa's pre-1994 spatial planning deliberately excluded black and poor communities from well-located urban land — and the post-apartheid planning framework inherited much of that legacy. But SPLUMA, in force from 1 July 2015, replaced the narrow "need and desirability" test with five statutory principles that compel every Municipal Planning Tribunal to weigh spatial justice and redress alongside sustainability, efficiency and governance. Therefore no land use decision under SPLUMA is merely technical: rejecting or approving a rezoning application now requires tribunals to confront questions of equity, access and historical imbalance head-on, and document how each of the five principles was considered.